Trends in functional limitations among older Americans and possible reasons for such trends are documented here for the period of 1984 to 1993. The focus was on noninstitutionalized Americans (50 years and older) and their ability to see words in a newspaper, carry ten pounds, climb stairs, and walk one-quarter of a mile. Large declines were found in the crude prevalence of functional limitations, especially among those 80 years and older. Changes in population composition explained only a small portion of the downward trends. Changes in population composition, device use, survey design, role expectations, and living environments do not appear to account completely for improvements in functioning. Instead, changes in underlying physiological capability, real or perceived, probably underlie these trends.
Originally published in: American Journal of Public Health, v. 8, no. 10, October 1998, pp. 1457-1462.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.