Research Brief
The Effect of Case Management on Immunization Rates and Well-Child Care
Dec 31, 1997
Utilization of well-child care services for African-American infants in a low-income community : results of a randomized, controlled case management and home visiting intervention
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback7 pages | Free |
This study evaluates a case management/home visitation intervention to improve access to and utilization of well-child care (WCC) visits, through use of randomized, controlled trials with baseline and follow-up interview surveys. Mothers and infants in the intervention group were assigned case managers who made at least four home visits during the infantUs first year of life. The group consisted of a population-based random sample of African-American mothers of newborns from South Central Los Angeles: 185 mothers in the intervention group and 180 in the control group completed both interview surveys. There was little change in the overall distribution of number of WCC visits during the first year of life. In light of the high expense of this intervention, this evaluation shows that a moderate-intensity case management and home visitation program is not an effective way to increase the number of WCC visits.
Related Products
Originally published in: Pediatrics, v. 101, no. 6, p. 999-1005, June 1998, pp. 999-1005.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.