The outcomes utility index : will outcomes data tell us what we want to know?

by Elizabeth A. McGlynn

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback6 pages Free

This study proposes an approach to evaluate the utility of an outcome measure in making comparisons among health plans, hospitals, networks, or other accountable entities. Seven components are recommended for evaluation: whether the outcome is a health outcome; the relative complexity of events that produce the outcome; the degree to which attribution can reasonably be made; the suitability of risk adjustment for limiting external sources of variation; and the likelihood that the measure provides perverse behavioral incentives. Illustrative examples are given in each area for scoring the performance of measures on the component. Outcomes measurement is of great interest to a variety of potential users. The approach proposed here is intended to provoke discussion and more rigorous development of tools that will help identify the measures likely to produce the most useful information for making comparisons among accountable entities in the health system.

Originally published in: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, v. 10, no. 6, 1998, pp. 485-490.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.