Underuse of cardiac procedures : do women, ethnic minorities, and the uninsured fail to receive needed revascularization?

by Lucian L. Leape, Lee H. Hilborne, Robert M. Bell, Caren Kamberg, Robert H. Brook

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback10 pages Free

Women, ethnic minorities and uninsured persons receive fewer cardiac procedures than affluent white male patients do, but rates of use are crude indicators of quality. The important question is, do women, minorities, and the uninsured fail to receive cardiac procedures when they need them? To measure receipt of necessary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) overall by patient sex, ethnicity, and payer status; and by availablity of on-site revascularization, a retrospective, randomized medical record review was conducted in 13 of the 24 hospitals in New York City that provide cornonary angiography. Although revascularization procedures are substantially underused, no variations in rate of use by sex, ethnic group, or payer status were seen among patients treated in hospitals that provide CABG surgery and PTCA. However, underuse was significantly greater in hospitals that do not provide these procedures, particularly among uninsured persons.

Originally published in: Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 130, no. 3, February 1999, pp. 183-192.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.