Cover: Product and Stock Market Response to Automotive Product Liability Verdicts

Product and Stock Market Response to Automotive Product Liability Verdicts

Published 1999

by Steven Garber, John L. Adams

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback53 pages Free

Claims about detrimental economic effects of product liability are a cornerstone of efforts by tort reformers to rally support. It seems fair to say, however, that existing evidence about economic effects of product liability is sketchy. In this paper, the authors attempt to develop information about a narrow but important piece of a very complex puzzle. In particular, they develop quantitative evidence about a component of automobile manufacturers’ incentives stemming from product liability by examining effects of trial verdicts on company stock prices and on new vehicle sales. The authors know of no similar study.

Originally published in: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 1998, pp. 1-53.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.