To assist in the understanding of how different types of information affect the outcome of an adversary process, the paper focuses on the concept of information superiority, exploring its dimensions. The paper draws on game theory to obtain insight into the problem. Four games are postulated, as follows: (1) Side 1 and Side 2 have correct information, (2) Side 1 has correct information and Side 2 has incorrect information, (3) Side 1 and Side 2 have correct information and Side 1 knows Side 2's choice of strategy, and (4) Side 1 has correct informaiton, Side 2 has incorrect information, and Side 1 knows Side 2's choice of strategy. The number of strategies available to both sides is varied. The result is that the value of the various types of information differs substantially, allowing both quantitative and qualitative insights about the value of possessing correct information, denying correct information to the opponent, and knowing the opponent's chosen strategy.
Originally published in: Phalanx, v. 31, no. 4, December 1998, pp. 6-7, 33-34.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.