Cover: Cost-containment and adverse selection in Medicaid HMOs

Cost-containment and adverse selection in Medicaid HMOs

Published 1999

by Dana P. Goldman, Arleen Leibowitz, Joan L. Buchanan

Purchase Print Copy

 Format
Add to Cart Paperback9 pages Free

Examines whether substituting a health maintenance organization (HMO) for traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid insurance reduces the cost of children's health care. In nonrandomized settings, unobserved selection could bias estimates of HMO performance. To control for selection, researchers often rely on parametric assumptions or use instrumental-variables methods. We pursued a different approach based on semiparametric maximum-likelihood techniques, which Monte Carlo studies have shown to be quite robust in many contexts. We applied this model to data from a self-selected sample of children in either a Medicaid HMO or traditional FFS in Florida. After controlling for selection, we estimated that the HMO reduced expenditures by 9.1%. A simple model assuming no selection predicts no savings. We validated our estimates by comparing our results with those obtained from a randomized sample of HMO and FFS enrollees. These comparisons indicate that the HMO reduces expenditures by 13.6%. We conclude that selection can substantially bias estimates of HMO impact and that our approach .provides a potentially useful method for accounting for this bias.

Originally published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 93, no. 441, 1998, pp. 54-62.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.