Cost-containment and adverse selection in Medicaid HMOs

by Dana P. Goldman, Arleen Leibowitz, Joan L. Buchanan


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback9 pages Free

Examines whether substituting a health maintenance organization (HMO) for traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid insurance reduces the cost of children's health care. In nonrandomized settings, unobserved selection could bias estimates of HMO performance. To control for selection, researchers often rely on parametric assumptions or use instrumental-variables methods. We pursued a different approach based on semiparametric maximum-likelihood techniques, which Monte Carlo studies have shown to be quite robust in many contexts. We applied this model to data from a self-selected sample of children in either a Medicaid HMO or traditional FFS in Florida. After controlling for selection, we estimated that the HMO reduced expenditures by 9.1%. A simple model assuming no selection predicts no savings. We validated our estimates by comparing our results with those obtained from a randomized sample of HMO and FFS enrollees. These comparisons indicate that the HMO reduces expenditures by 13.6%. We conclude that selection can substantially bias estimates of HMO impact and that our approach .provides a potentially useful method for accounting for this bias.

Originally published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association, v. 93, no. 441, 1998, pp. 54-62.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.