Cover: Lifetime Costs and Compensation for Injuries

Lifetime Costs and Compensation for Injuries

Published 2000

by M. Susan Marquis, Willard G. Manning

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback11 pages Free

Little is known about how well individuals are compensated for injuries. This study uses data from a 1989 survey to estimate both the lifetime costs and compensation for injuries. Its findings show that about 55% of the cost is compensated by public or private programs. Compensation rates are lower for disabling injuries and those of long duration. The results also suggest that compensation system reforms that would place stricter limits on maximum compensation might not be a distributionally fair solution. The reasons are that costs are highly skewed, and the share of costs recovered by compensation programs is currently lowest for injuries that are long-term, disabling, and the most expensive.

Originally published in: Inquiry, v. 36, no. 3, Fall 1999, pp. 244-254.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.