Class Size Reduction in California: The 1998-99 Evaluation Findings
ResearchPublished 2000
By 1998-99, California's legislature-mandated class size reduction program was 92 percent implemented; those classes that had not been reduced in size were concentrated in districts serving high percentages of minority, low-income, or English-learner (EL) students. The qualifications of K-3 teachers continued to decline but at a slower rate than in the past; schools serving minority, low-income, or EL students had fewer well-qualified teachers than other schools. Teachers in reduced-size classes spent more time working individually with students during mathematics and language arts lessons, and reported less classroom disruption. There was a small positive gain in student achievement for third grade students in reduced-size classes, regardless of their background characteristics, and these positive effects persisted even after students returned to a non-reduced size class in fourth grade. The authors recommend that state policymakers (1) ensure that funding and facilities problems do not undermine the effectiveness of the program; (2) focus on improving qualifications of the teacher workforce in schools serving minority, low-income, and EL students; (3) encourage the strategic use of federal funds to address the problems identified in the report; (4) mandate improvements in the state's education data system, and (5) evaluate future school reform efforts thoroughly to ensure that California gets the most value for its investment.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 2000
- Pages: 250
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: RP-903
This publication is part of the RAND reprint series. The reprint series, a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011, included previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports that were reproduced by RAND with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see external publications.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.