Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price
Add to Cart Paperback9 pages Free

This article traces the development of empirical research on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and its impact on the legal system. In the 1980s, legislators, judges, court administrators, and lawyers acted largely as interested onlookers in the research process. But, as the author notes, research on court ADR — especially with an evaluative component — has become unwelcome in some quarters. The author recalls RAND's report on the results of ADR under the controversial Civil Justice Reform Act of 1996 and the surprising level of criticism the study received from the ADR community. The author cites other examples of hostility regarding ADR research directed at the academic community at large, and notes that empirical research nevertheless continues apace. The author offers several explanations for the current attitudes on evaluative ADR research, and concludes by posing questions on the future of this research.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. The Reprint was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.