Cover: Review of Steven Kull and I.M. Destler, Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism

Review of Steven Kull and I.M. Destler, Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism

Published 2002

by Eric V. Larson

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback4 pages Free

There are a number of gaps in public opinion on foreign policy that deserve closer analysis. This review discusses Steven Kull and I. M. Destler's "Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism," which focuses on the question: Why does there appear to be a gap between policymakers' perceptions of public attitudes on foreign affairs and actual public attitudes? "Misreading the Public" is the culmination of a number of years of public opinion polling on foreign policy attitudes by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes.

Research conducted by

Originally published in: Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 63, no. 4, Winter 1999, pp. 624-627.

This report is part of the RAND reprint series. The Reprint was a product of RAND from 1992 to 2011 that represented previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints were formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial policy and compliant with RAND's rigorous quality assurance standards for quality and objectivity. For select current RAND journal articles, see External Publications.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.