Litigant Perceptions of Legal Procedures

What Do Litigants Want From the Tort System?

Edgar Lind, Robert J. MacCoun, Patricia A. Ebener, William L. F. Felstiner, Deborah R. Hensler, Judith Resnik, Tom Tyler

Research SummaryPublished 1989

This research brief describes work documented in The Perception of Justice: Tort Litigants' Views of Trial, Court-Annexed Arbitration, and Judicial Settlement Conferences (R-3708-ICJ).

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 1989
  • Paperback Pages: 2
  • Document Number: RB-9009

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Lind, Edgar, Robert J. MacCoun, Patricia A. Ebener, William L. F. Felstiner, Deborah R. Hensler, Judith Resnik, and Tom Tyler, Litigant Perceptions of Legal Procedures: What Do Litigants Want From the Tort System? RAND Corporation, RB-9009, 1989. As of October 8, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9009.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Lind, Edgar, Robert J. MacCoun, Patricia A. Ebener, William L. F. Felstiner, Deborah R. Hensler, Judith Resnik, and Tom Tyler, Litigant Perceptions of Legal Procedures: What Do Litigants Want From the Tort System? Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1989. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9009.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND research brief series. Research briefs present policy-oriented summaries of individual published, peer-reviewed documents or of a body of published work.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.