Length of Time That Medicaid Covers Medication for Opioid Use Disorder
Research SummaryPublished Dec 21, 2023
Research SummaryPublished Dec 21, 2023
Percentage of people meeting the criteria for an OUD diagnosis who receive two or more OUD treatment services (including medication for OUD) within 34 days of initiating treatment.
| Effect Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| Beneficial | In states without current coverage requirements, guaranteed continuous (short-term) access to insurance will increase treatment engagement. | “Knowing you will have access to medication will help with engagement. Few people will be excited about treatment if they know the medication they need will be terminated quickly” |
| Little-to-no (selected) |
Most people already have coverage for initial treatment engagement. | “I'm not aware of current coverage policies but would be amazed if they were less than six months so I'm not clear this would represent a significant change” |
| Harmful | N/A | N/A |
Percentage of people meeting the criteria for an OUD diagnosis who remain continuously enrolled in OUD treatment services for at least six months.
| Effect Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| Beneficial (selected) |
Guaranteeing Medicaid coverage for six months should lead to retention in treatment for six months (although retention after six months may decrease if Medicaid coverage is not extended). | “Medication for OUD improves retention in treatment. Since Medicaid is the largest provider of OUD treatment, if it covers treatment for 6 months or more, treatment retention would be greatly improved” |
| Little-to-no | Depends on the status quo in a state, as well as the proportion of the population using opioids to which this policy would be applicable. | “A sizable number of Americans have Medicaid, so coverage for at least 6 months should increase this retention metric. But there's also a large population with private insurance, so that's why this impact is not larger” |
| Harmful | N/A | N/A |
Percentage of people meeting the criteria for an OUD diagnosis who do not experience OUD symptoms (other than craving/desire/urge for opioid) for at least 12 months.
| Effect Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| Beneficial | Increases in retention will lead to increases in remission. | “This policy is likely to have no impact on initiating treatment but would increase treatment engagement and retention and, therefore, a potentially modest increase in OUD remission” |
| Little-to-no (selected) |
Depends on the status quo in a state, and whether coverage will be extended past six months. | “The coverage proposed is only guaranteed for 6 months, so I think the increase of people not experiencing OUD symptoms for 12 months would not change much” |
| Harmful | Negative impacts on long-term remission if coverage ends at six months. | “If it stops coverage [between] 6–12 months it will actually work to decrease people in treatment after 6 months” |
Per capita rates of fatal overdose related to opioids, including opioid analgesics (e.g., oxycodone), illegal opioids (e.g., heroin), and synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl).
| Effect Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| Beneficial | Greater treatment retention should lead to decreased overdose mortality, especially as the policy would facilitate greater access to MOUD for a higher-risk population. | “People with lower incomes need access like everyone else. The greater the access to care, the greater the chances of avoiding overdose fatalities” |
| Little-to-no (selected) |
Limited impact given either (1) limited change from status quo or (2) limited time frame for extended coverage. | “Slight reduction, could be larger if coverage extended beyond 6 [months]” |
| Harmful | Potential short-term reductions in overdose mortality could be countered by increases after coverage ends at six months. | “This will help save lives initially, but not making available after 6 months could be dangerous” |
The extent to which the policy is acceptable to the general public in the state or community where the policy has been enacted.
| Implementation Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| High (selected) |
Public generally approves of expanded insurance coverage, especially for medical care that can address the overdose epidemic. | “Overall, I think that the general public expects treatment, including medication treatment, to be covered by insurance” |
| Moderate | Might receive some pushback from those who do not understand MOUDs, who see Medicaid coverage for MOUD as unearned or inappropriate, or who approve of MOUD coverage but see six months as insufficient. | “Depends on the public's understanding of MOUD—would require public education on why these medications may be used for indefinite periods of time; might be pushback if people question why these medications are covered and not other medications for chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, that are more common among the general population and thus many are likely to have personal exposure” |
| Low | Public would oppose setting a coverage limit to six months. | “Most [of the] general public is not focused on length of time—they are more in the 'yes' or 'no' category. If they are already at 'yes,' why impose limits of any type?” |
The extent to which it is feasible for a state or community to implement the policy as intended.
| Implementation Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| High (selected) |
A common type of modification to Medicaid policy. | “Operationalizing this would not be challenging, and modifications of service durations are something we do often” |
| Moderate | Depends on how a state implements Medicaid policy. | “Dependent in part on state budgets, although federal match is generous for expansion coverage” |
| Low | N/A | N/A |
The extent to which the resources (costs) required to implement the policy are affordable from a societal perspective.
| Implementation Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| High (selected) |
Extending coverage to (affordable) MOUD will yield significant societal benefits (i.e., cost-effective policy). | “In the grand scheme of things, MOUD is not that expensive, particularly if it reduces [emergency department] and hospital utilization” |
| Moderate | Depends on the status quo in the state (e.g., current funding sources, length of coverage, medications covered). Costs could be offset by societal benefits. | “There are inconsistent funding streams to support these models at high quality and volume matching need” |
| Low | States using six months as the limit for coverage will lead people to return to opioid use, leading to downstream costs for these states. | “Termination of coverage for OUD medication after a defined period of time will ultimately increase expenditures as a proportion of those patients who lose their coverage will be unable to afford medication on their own and may increase risk for return to use” |
The extent to which the policy is equitable in its impact on health outcomes across populations of people who use opioids.
| Implementation Rating | Summary of Expert Opinion | Representative Quotations |
|---|---|---|
| High (selected) |
Focus on Medicaid specifically will lead to improved outcomes among socially disadvantaged populations (especially if states implement the policy for longer than the six-month minimum). | “This may improve equity for those with Medicaid as compared to those with private pay as it relates to health outcomes (though again should be no lifetime limits)” |
| Moderate | Depends on status quo among the Medicaid-eligible population within a state. | “Hard to say. It's good to cover MOUD for at least 6 months, and Medicaid covers the most vulnerable populations. So could increase equity. But also, 6 months isn't very long” |
| Low | States using six months as the limit for coverage will increase disparities in care and outcomes for OUD. | “Limits on Medicaid coverage are by definition inequitable. ... Limiting to 6 months is cruel; requiring at least 6 months is insufficient. Medicaid should not time-limit coverage for any life-threatening, treatable, chronic disease, like opioid use disorder. Otherwise, what is the point of insurance?” |
This publication is part of the RAND research brief series. Research briefs present policy-oriented summaries of individual published, peer-reviewed documents or of a body of published work.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
Summary of Expert Ratings
Summary of Expert Comments