Production Characteristics of Hi-Valu Airframe Spare Parts

by J. R. Renshaw

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback27 pages $20.00 $16.00 20% Web Discount

An examination of the manufacturing processes of a selected group of Hi-Valu airframe spares and of some opportunities for increased flexibility in supply through the use of buffer stocks. The major types of spares (continuous production spares, periodic production spares, and vendor items) are examined, and in particular the group of Hi-Valu airframe spares on the F-104 Starfighter are considered. It is concluded that the ratio of continuous production parts to periodic production parts for complete spares and the very different ratio for components influence decisions on the composition of a buffer stock.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.