Cover: Attitudes of the French parliament and government toward atomic weapons.

Attitudes of the French parliament and government toward atomic weapons.

Published 1958

by C. De la Malene, C. Melnik, R. Manheim

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback80 pages $25.00

A discussion of the attitudes of the French government and parliament toward atomic weapons since their discovery and use. Part I deals with the historic development of these attitudes (e.g., those ranging from the total absence of nuclearmindedness to the growth of the atomic weapon issue in the minds of civilians and military alike). Part II describes the causes of the lag in nuclear-mindedness: the "European" controversy, the French parliamentary situation, atomic neutralism, the rules of the French political "game," feelings of incapacity, fear of public opinion, and the changes implied by an atomic arsenal. (See also RM-2954-RC.)

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.