Cover: Supply and depot-repair interactions: a case study of electronics support.

Supply and depot-repair interactions: a case study of electronics support.

by James W. Petersen, Robert M. Paulson, Wilbur Steger

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback61 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

A study concerned with a segment of the electronics- support cycle in Air Force logistics. An attempt is made to analyze the nature of the response-supply tradeoff for the depot-repair cycle to determine the proper mix of depot-maintenance effort and supply stocks and to achieve the most economical joint cost for a given level of support efficiency. The depot-repair cycle is defined as the time interval between the start of physical repair action and the shipping of the repaired item back into the supply system. While the analysis is limited to fire-control-support experience, the nature of the tradeoff studied applies to any depot-reparable item. The study demonstrates the importance of including the supply-cost implications of repair-cycle length as an explicit element in planning repair capability and as a criterion of depot performance.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.