A comparison of two theories of sentence structure. One theory groups words into phrases, and phrases into larger phrases, until each complete sentence is grouped into a single unit. The other treats connections between words, making the whole structure of each sentence into a "tree," resembling an organization chart. The study shows that results obtained by the two theories are similar but not identical: for a given grouping, several trees are possible, and vice versa. Since RAND is almost the sole proponent of the tree theory, the similarities and differences between what RAND and others are doing are emphasized.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.