Communications Satellites

An Introductory Survey of Technology and Economic Promise

by William Meckling, S. H. Reiger


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback57 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

A discussion of the ability of communications satellite systems to provide broadband, long-distance communications at microwave frequencies without depending on intermediate ground-relay stations. Various alternative systems are identified: passive systems, low-orbit active systems, and twenty-four hour satellite systems. Part I of this study surveys the characteristics of these systems and assesses their advantages and disadvantages. Part II estimates the economic potential of communications satellites in terms of cost comparisons with other forms of telecommunications and in terms of demand prospects. A communications satellite system would very greatly increase the number of long-distance increase the number of long-distance channels available, and the cost per channel is therefore tied critically to the question of future demand for additional channels. (An abridgment of RM-2925.)

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.