Cover: Power-Bandwidth Trade-offs for Feedback FM Systems

Power-Bandwidth Trade-offs for Feedback FM Systems

A Comparison with Pulse-Code-Modulation

Published 1961

by Edward Bedrosian


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback48 pages $23.00

A discussion of the use of negative feedback in FM (frequency-modulation) receivers to lower the signal level required for a given quality of performance. This technique could be important in the design of communications satellites because it minimizes the amount of transmitter power that must be placed in orbit. The author shows that the use of large amounts of feedback can reduce the transmitter power required by about 8 db (compared with a conventional FM system designed to minimize transmitter power) and by about 5 db (compared with a pulse-code-modulation system of comparable performance). The penalty paid for this improvement is an increase in the bandwidth occupied: The feedback system requires a radio channel about twice as wide as that used by either of the other two systems

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.