Cover: The strength of underground cavities of spherical and spheroidal geometry

The strength of underground cavities of spherical and spheroidal geometry

Published 1961

by J. M. Green

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback29 pages $20.00

Expressions for the static-stress distribution over the surface of a degenerate prolate spheroidal cavity which is subjected to a given internal pressure and a given lithostatic loading at infinity. The hoop stress is evaluated at the apex of the spheroidal cavity and is compared with the hoop stress at the corresponding point of a spherical cavity, which is subjected to the same loading. Both cavities are presumed to fail when the hoop stress ceases to be compressive. It is shown that the maximum internal pressure which may be sustained by each of the cavities depends on the Poisson ratio. For certain values of the Poisson ratio, the spherical cavity can actually contain larger internal pressures than the spheroidal cavity, in spite of the fact that when the cavities are "empty," the spheroidal cavity has a hoop stress at its apex which is more compressive that that of the spherical cavity. Expressions for the static-stress distribution over the surface of a degenerate prolate spheroidal cavity that is subjected to a given internal pressure and a given lithostatic loading at infinity. The hoop stress is evaluated at the apex of the spheroidal cavity and is compared with the hoop stress at the corresponding point of a spherical cavity, which is subjected to the same loading. Both cavities are presumed to fail when the hoop stress ceases to be compressive. It is shown that the maximum internal pressure that may be sustained by each of the cavities depends on the Poisson ratio. For certain values of the Poisson ratio, the spherical cavity can actually contain larger internal pressures than the spheroidal cavity, in spite of the fact that when the cavities are "empty," the spheroidal cavity has a hoop stress at its apex that is more compressive than that of the spherical cavity. 34 pp

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.