Cover: The Costs and Benefits of Responsive Support Operations.

The Costs and Benefits of Responsive Support Operations.

Published 1962

by James W. Petersen, H. W. Nelson, Robert M. Paulson

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback135 pages $35.00

The second of a series of studies covering the results of LP-III, the third experiment conducted in the Rand Logistics Systems Laboratory. LP-III attempts to determine how the management potential in recent technological advances (e.g., transceivers for high-speed data transmission, electronic computers for data processing and management control, and airlift for base-depot movement of supplies) can be used to improve Air Force spare-parts support operations. This memorandum examines one aspect of developing an improved support system, namely, how responsive the system should be in translating changing support needs into workloads in the backup areas of support. Since operating and control costs tend to increase as system response increases, there is a tradeoff between the benefits and costs of achieving various degrees of support responsiveness. Several ways are suggested for improving Air Force support operations.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.