Programming Languages and Standardization in Command and Control.
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback75 pages | $25.00 | $20.00 20% Web Discount |
A study of computer programming languages in the field of command and control. An evaluation of current programming languages indicates that it is not now appropriate to establish a standard programming language, but that planning for standardization should begin immediately. Particularly needed are a data-processing glossary, magnetic tape recording formats, and character sets. Also needed is a central Air Force agency to establish measures of performance, plan for standardization, and coordinate computer selection. The study suggests that the Air Force take the lead in directing and supporting research efforts to improve the state-of-the-art, and that the present indoctrination program in computers and computer programming for Air Force officers be supplemented by courses in the established USAF schools. In addition, a training program is urgently needed to develop a cadre of skilled programmers in the Air Force.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.