Linguistic and non-linguistic "understanding" of linguistic tokens.
ResearchPublished 1964
An examination of the difference between recognizing an utterance as a "symptom" of the state of affairs or confronting its originator and recognizing it as a linguistic tool. It is suggested that, although only the first kind of understanding is required to enable a computer to accept data and answer questions in verbal form, such ability does not guarantee its comprehension of all aspects of language. To reach full linguistic comprehension, the program must also embody at least a skeleton representation of the linguistic context of an utterance. By use of such a model, a computer should be able to meet more sensitive tests of linguistic comprehension. 19 pp.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1964
- Pages: 12
- Document Number: RM-3892-PR
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.