Description of a technique for evaluating the productivity of large transport aircraft in Army deployments. Using results from previous simulations, the method estimates aircraft productivity without requiring additional simulations. This Memorandum provides information on relative productivities of the C-141 and alternative proposed designs for the new large CX-HLS transport. The basic elements of the method are route analysis and loading simulation. For any specified type of deployment, the results from a limited number of cases can be used to derive tables which, together with an aircraft's payload-range curve, allow determination of the minimum fleet-size required for a specified task or, alternatively, of the magnitude of the task a given fleet can perform.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.