Cover: Communist strategy in Japan, 1945-1960 [by] A. Rodger Swearingen.

Communist strategy in Japan, 1945-1960 [by] A. Rodger Swearingen.

Published 1965

by Rodger Swearingen

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback421 pages $80.00

A case study of the policies, platforms, and technisques employed and problems encountered by th Communist party in Japan from 1945 to 1960. The Memorandum does not attempt to assess the current prospects for Communism there, or to evaluate current Communist policies or practices. It provides historical perspective and background against which to assess events since 1960. Special attention is given to Communist efforts to use labor as a political weapon. A case study of the policies, platforms, and techniques employed and problems encountered by the Communist party in Japan from 1945 to 1960. The Memorandum does not attempt to assess the current prospects for Communism there, or to evaluate current Communist policies or practices. It provides historical perspective and background against which to assess events since 1960. Special attention is given to Communist efforts to use labor as a political weapon. 421 pp.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.