Estimating Cost Uncertainty Using Monte Carlo Techniques

by Paul F. Dienemann


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback49 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

Part of a study to improve techniques for estimating costs of future weapon systems. The Memorandum presents a technique for expressing such cost estimates as probability distributions that reflect the uncertainty of the estimate. This information is shown to be relevant to the decisionmaking process. The study depicts the relationship between the sources of uncertainty and system cost estimates as an input-output model and, within this framework, a procedure is developed to estimate probability distributions for each of the input uncertainties. From the input distributions, a Monte Carlo procedure is used to generate a series of cost estimates. A frequency distribution and common statistical measures are then prepared from the output estimates to determine the nature and magnitude of the system cost uncertainty. A case study involving the cost estimate of a hypothetical aircraft system with air-to-surface missiles is presented.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.