Radar-Echo Considerations Regarding Reentry Decoys with Low-Frequency Capability.

by J. L. Raymond


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback59 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

Proposed designs and radar echo analysis of decoys capable of simulating the low-frequency radar echo and velocity-altitude behavior of a slender, pointed nose cone entering the earth's atmosphere. This memorandum is the concluding publication of a series of studies that began at Rand in 1957 on the reentry aspects of missiles and decoys in the penetration of ABM defense. The present investigation of decoys as penetration aids was undertaken to help solve the problem of simulating a nose cone's static radar echo near resonance. 59 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.