Base Maintenance Activity and Repair Cycle Times

Annette Weifenbach

ResearchPublished 1966

An analysis of supply and maintenance data collected over seven months at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (AFB). One squadron of B-52s and miscellaneous aircraft generated 10,965 maintenance actions (for 3,220 items), 51 percent being repairs on base, 4 percent bench-checked serviceable, and 45 percent not reparable this station (NRTS). Half of the items had only one demand in the 213 days. Net repair cycles averaged 10.7, 6.6, and 6.8 days for repaired, bench-check, and NRTS, respectively. Including maintenance and parts delays adds 3.5 days to repaired and NRTS actions and 1 day to bench-checks. Although demand levels for most individual items are insensitive to chance variations in repair cycle times, the aggregate demand level for the group is responsive to even small changes in the average group cycle time. NRTS actions account for a third of the on-base net processing time, yet this time is excluded from the stock-level computations. Including it would increase the aggregate demand level for the 3,220 items by 37 percent. An average repair cycle time can be used to estimate the demand level for a group of items with reasonable accuracy. By expressing this level as a ratio of stock per item, it is possible to determine the effect of changes in repair cycles or in average demand for different groups of items.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Weifenbach, Annette, Base Maintenance Activity and Repair Cycle Times. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1966. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM5027.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.