Cover: The Performance of Several Incoherent Sequential Detectors.

The Performance of Several Incoherent Sequential Detectors.

Published 1967

by Louis H. Wegner

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback76 pages $25.00

An evaluation of the performance of several sequential detectors for the case of incoherent detection; that is, when the pulse-to-pulse radar returns are independent observations on the envelope of a sine wave in narrow-band Gaussian noise. Two sequential probability ratio tests (SPRTs) and the biased square law sequential detector (BSLSD) were compared for blip/scan ratio and average test time for static and fluctuating targets at known range. The SPRT for Swerling's Model II fluctuating target is the preferred sequential test; it gives a 4 to 7 db improvement over the optimum fixed-duration tests. Wald's approximations for SPRT evaluation were compared with the exact results and found to be inadequate for large signal/noise ratios. The APRST and MPRST (averaged and maximum probability ratio sequential tests) were evaluated and compared with optimum fixed-duration tests for unknown range conditions (multiple range resolution cells). (See also RM-1217.) 76 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.