Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback84 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

An overview of some possible avenues of development for New York's air transportation system from now until 1980. Three ways of adding to the system's capacity are investigated: (1) continuing to operate mainly from the present three airport sites; (2) developing new capacity for the short- and medium-length-of-trip market; and (3) constructing a fourth major airport 40 or 50 miles from Manhattan. The three alternatives are compared in terms of major investment outlays, time phasing of capacity additions, and vulnerability to forecast errors. The analysis indicates that expansion in the next several years will be limited to the type envisioned by the V/STOL system, e.g., creation of a major STOL port near mid-Manhattan. If a program of peripheral and V/STOL airports can be developed to serve a significant portion of air travel in the area, the need for a fourth airport may be delayed. However, it may be wise to acquire ownership or control of a site as soon as possible. (See also RM-5816, RM-5817, RM-5818, RM-5819.)

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.