Cover: A Model and Computer Code for Studying Alternative Air Passenger Processing Strategies

A Model and Computer Code for Studying Alternative Air Passenger Processing Strategies

Published 1969

by Dale M. Landi, Alan J. Rolfe

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback78 pages $25.00

Description of a method for assessing the effectiveness of alternative airport locations, passenger terminal locations, and mass transportation systems involved in processing air passengers to their destinations in a large metropolitan area. Data inputs to the model are the nodes and arcs of a road travel-time or travel-cost network, the locations of passenger terminals in the network, the times or costs associated with each destination served by each terminal, and the volumes of passenger trips from population centroids. The program, written in FORTRAN IV for the IBM 7044, is appended. It computes volumes of passenger trips processed by each terminal for each trip origin and the average passenger trip times or costs for each terminal and for the entire system. It can also locate passenger terminals or airports that minimize the overall average trip time or cost. (See also RM-5815, RM-5816, RM-5817, RM-5819.)

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.