Theoretical Evaluation of a Patient-Artificial Kidney System Using the Kiil Dialyzer.
ResearchPublished 1969
A mathematical model of hemodialysis (artificial kidney treatment) that can accurately predict the changes in distribution of urea and creatinine in the patient's body during dialysis, for a wide range of system parameters. The model was validated using considerable clinical data from two patients, plus one-time data from 10 randomly chosen patients on the Kiil Dialyzer. The predicted fraction removed during dialysis was plotted as a function of blood-flow rate, length of dialysis, initial blood concentrations, and patient weight. Results suggest that in most dialysis patients, material removal during dialysis and blood concentrations afterward can be accurately predicted from just the patient's weight and his rate of blood flow into the dialyzer. The computer-generated results can be valuable to the clinician by showing the time needed to dialyze a given patient to achieve a desired result. 46 pp. Ref.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1969
- Pages: 46
- Document Number: RM-5955
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.