[Soviet Cybernetics : Recent News Items], Vol. 3, No. 4.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback145 pages||$35.00||$28.00 20% Web Discount|
The April issue features an extended description of the BESM-6 hardware, software, and list of instructions; the computer does not appear well suited to the multiprogramming for which it was designed. Soviet game theory is described as similar in level to that of the United States, but is of different content. It has been applied successfully to control and productivity (often as a game against Nature, as in catching fish or planning transmission lines). In view of the shortage and inferiority of Soviet computers, a political economy faculty calls for hardware, software, and services similar to those of the capitalist states --if necessary, by licensing foreign patents. Other articles give criteria for installing automatic control systems; defend the usefulness of mathematical optimization methods; recommend forecasting of technical developments through the study of patents; report work on noncrystalline semiconductors used as vidicons; and describe medical applications of computers. 145 pp.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.