Research
The Pilot Training Study: Personnel Flow and the PILOT Model
Jan 1, 1969
Advanced Pilot Training
ResearchPublished 1969
A description of the general framework and complexities of formaltraining courses in terms of types of aircraft, organization and mission areas, bases, and commands.Formal training is provided for 52 types of aircraft by five commands in six different mission areas. In general, pilots qualify to operate a specific aircraft and to fly a particular mission by completing the prescribed formal course as listed in the USAF Formal Schools Catalog (AFM 50-5). Courses cover both ground and flying training and last from 2 to 31 weeks. They are designed to fit student qualifications and experience; conversely, criteria for selecting students must be compatible with the demands of the course. In estimating the resource requirements for planning and budgeting, the analyst must first identify all resources contributing to pilot training and then distribute the student-pilot resources consumption among individual student pilots to show how changes in student strength affect resource requirements. (See also RM-6080 through RM-6084, RM-6086, RM-6087.)
This publication is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The research memorandum series, a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973, included working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.