An Analysis of Phase-In Information Flows.

by Robert M. Paulson, R. B. Waina


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback48 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

A detailed report on the data recording and analysis system used to capture the reliability/failure characteristics of the F-111A during the Category III tests at Nellis AFB, and a comparison of the results with the data needs of those responsible for procurement, provisioning, and product improvement programs. There is no formal system for transmitting the test results or other phasing-in information to the decisionmakers, although AFLCM 57-3 requires those who plan spares support to take test, NORS, and usage data into account. AFLC, the support command, the using command, and the contractor all use their own data sources, which are not coordinated and are likely to be mutually inconsistent. Even the special extended KO-43 data analysis system for the FB-111 fails to record which parts failed, or to report unfilled orders, thus misrepresenting demand. (The kill information needs only to be retrieved from the transaction tape.) With solid data, large commitments could be deferred until results were known. Product improvement programs would also be less needed and less costly. Large savings could result from the systematic flow of test data to the decisionmakers, in the way that reliability information is obtained from some lead-the-fleet aircraft in MAC. 48 pp. Ref.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.