Cover: Longitudinal Station Keeping of Nearly Geostationary Satellites

Longitudinal Station Keeping of Nearly Geostationary Satellites

Published 1969

by Neill C. Ostrander

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback63 pages $23.00

An examination of the gravitational effects of the sun, moon, and triaxial earth upon the longitudinal motion of near-synchronous equatorial satellites. Accurate station-keeping of a nominally geosynchronous satellite requires the application of control forces to offset these gravitational effects. This study extends earlier RAND work, complementing latitude motion studies with a corresponding examination of longitude and radial motions. Control system activity, which includes average annual pulse and frequency of pulse application, is related to station-keeping accuracy. Radial and longitudinal perturbations are calculated. The results are particularly relevant to the station-keeping problems imposed by a growing number of satellites in synchronous near-equatorial orbits. The present investigation is restricted to satellites limited to small excursions by periodic applications of impulsive control forces. Large-scale motions are described in R-399 and R-454.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.