Cover: Some Information Processing Implications of Air Force Space Missions

Some Information Processing Implications of Air Force Space Missions


Published 1970

by Barry W. Boehm


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback53 pages $15.00

Text of a briefing to the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board on problems in space and flight computing. Off-the-shelf information processing is inadequate for real-time image processing, multisensor analysis, decision-oriented displays, and the Space Transportation System (STS). Undetected program errors could lead to dangerous strategic confrontations or incapacitate a key defense at a critical time. The Air Force should (1) push development of a high-capability, high-capacity, floating-point on-board computer; (2) buy at least 50 to 100 percent more computing capacity than is absolutely necessary, to avoid complex space-saving programming; (3) begin serious work on the STS software now; and (4) study the feasibility of an Air Force software testing facility comparable with hardware testing facilities.

This report is part of the RAND research memorandum series. The Research Memorandum was a product of RAND from 1948 to 1973 that represented working papers meant to report current results of RAND research to appropriate audiences.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.