Mapping UK mental health research funding and its contribution to global funding

A refined analysis for the UK context

Gavin Cochrane, Alexandra Pollitt, Steven Wooding

ResearchPublished Oct 21, 2016

This briefing provides an analysis across the UK of government support for mental health research, with a particular emphasis on the UK Department of Health. This analysis builds on data collected for the project — Mapping the global mental health research system — which aimed to map the global funding of mental health research between 2009 and 2014, using bibliometric data to develop a picture of who the major funders were, what kinds of research they supported and how their strategies related to one another.

Topics

Document Details

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Cochrane, Gavin, Alexandra Pollitt, and Steven Wooding, Mapping UK mental health research funding and its contribution to global funding: A refined analysis for the UK context. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2016. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1774.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.