This report describes a proof-of-concept analysis using Robust Decision Making to evaluate water resource management response packages for California's Central Valley under future uncertainty. This analytic approach will be used to develop a more comprehensive analysis for the California Water Plan Update 2013.
Robust Water-Management Strategies for the California Water Plan Update 2013
Proof-of-Concept Analysis
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 1.6 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Summary Only
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 0.3 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Research Questions
- How could Robust Decision Making be used to structure a quantitative analysis of water management strategies in the Central Valley under uncertainty for the California Water Plan Update 2013?
- How can the analysis address how California's current management baseline would perform under different plausible futures?
- How can the analysis help determine the vulnerabilities of the current management baseline?
- How can the analysis address how additional management strategies might reduce vulnerabilities of the current management baseline?
- How can the analysis help determine key trade-offs among response packages?
California faces significant challenges in ensuring that its water resources successfully meet diverse needs across the state in the coming decades. Increasing needs due to population and economic growth, increasing agricultural irrigation requirements, and growing desires to dedicate more water to the environment will strain a system nearing or exceeding capacity. These challenges are exacerbated by potential declines in available water supply due to natural variability and climatic changes. How these long-term changes will unfold and affect California's water system is highly uncertain. Addressing the future uncertainty and diversity of needs requires a planning approach that is flexible and can support deliberations for different approaches, rather than a single prescription for how to move forward. The California Department of Water Resources' (DWR's) California Water Plan Update 2013 will describe current water management conditions, evaluate future challenges facing the California water sector, and discuss potential solutions. A technical analysis of water management response packages will also be developed. This report describes a proof-of-concept analysis using Robust Decision Making to evaluate water resource management response packages for California's Central Valley (the Sacramento River, San Joaquin River, and Tulare Lake hydrologic regions) under future uncertainty using models developed within the Water Evaluation And Planning environment. This analytic approach will be used to develop a more comprehensive analysis for the California Water Plan Update 2013. The analysis described in this report was presented to DWR's Statewide Water Analysis Network in May 2011.
Key Finding
The Proof-of-Concept Analysis Demonstrates That Robust Decision Making Could Support a Full Analysis for the Water Plan Update
- This study illustrated a methodology through the development of a proof-of-concept analysis. As vetted by California Department of Water Resources staff and California Water Plan stakeholders, the Robust Decision Making methodology is a viable and useful approach for supporting a more comprehensive analysis for the California Water Plan Update 2013.
Recommendation
- The Robust Decision Making methodology should be applied to the California Water Plan Update 2013.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
An Overview of Robust Decision Making
Chapter Three
Scope of the Proof-of-Concept Analysis
Chapter Four
Results: Vulnerability of the Current Management Baseline
Chapter Five
Results: Mitigating Vulnerabilities Through Response Packages
Chapter Six
Discussion
The research described in this report was prepared for the California Department of Water Resources and conducted in the Environment, Energy, and Economic Development Program within RAND Justice, Infrastructure, and Environment.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.