In the past two decades, the U.S. Air Force has participated in three contingencies involving no-fly zones (NFZs) over Bosnia, Iraq, and Libya, and NFZ proposals have been proffered for some time as an option for intervention in the Syrian civil war that would avoid placing Western troops on the ground. This paper is intended as a preliminary look at NFZs as a strategic approach in such situations, with an emphasis on the forms they might take, their potential utility, and their probable limitations.
Strategic Options for Employing No-Fly Zones
|PDF file||0.7 MB||Best for desktop computers.
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|ePub file||1.7 MB||Best for mobile devices.
On desktop computers and some mobile devices, you may need to download an eBook reader to view ePub files. Calibre is an example of a free and open source e-book library management application.
|mobi file||0.2 MB||Best for Kindle 1-3.
On desktop computers and some mobile devices, you may need to download an eBook reader to view mobi files. Amazon Kindle is the most popular reader for mobi files.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback24 pages||$14.95||$11.96 20% Web Discount|
- How were no-fly zones (NFZs) employed in past contingencies over Bosnia, Iraq, and Libya?
- What forms might NFZs take in the future, particularly if used a means of intervention in the Syrian civil war?
- What are the potential benefits and limitations of NFZs?
In recent years, discussions about external military intervention in local conflicts have often included consideration of no-fly zones (NFZs) as a policy option. In the past two decades, the U.S. Air Force has participated in three contingencies involving NFZs over Bosnia, Iraq, and Libya, and NFZ proposals have been proffered for some time as an option for intervention in the Syrian civil war that would avoid placing Western troops on the ground. This paper provides a preliminary look at NFZs as a strategic approach in such situations. It evaluates the possible objectives of NFZs, including (1) preventing the use of airpower, (2) coercing adversaries, (3) preparing future battlefields, (4) weakening potential enemies, (5) political posturing, and (6) signaling or creating commitment, and discusses the potential utility and probable limitations of each.
No-Fly Zones Can Serve a Variety of Purposes
- Keeping a target state from using its airpower against civilians or others can both protect people in the short term and alter the outcome of a conflict in the longer term.
- A no-fly zone (NFZ) can be used as a coercive lever to pressure the target to change its behavior or comply with other demands.
- Maintaining an NFZ can contribute to preparedness for subsequent air operations through the collection of imagery and electronic intelligence, the development of bases, and familiarization and practice for forces.
- An NFZ can play a role in undermining a target military economically and politically.
- An NFZ can show sympathy or moral support for those it is portrayed as protecting and can satisfy the imperative to respond to a crisis or provocation.
- Imposing an NFZ can muster domestic or international support for further military action.
But Their Potential Impact Is Limited
- While denying the use of airpower may matter a great deal in conflicts involving relatively evenly matched forces, it is unlikely on its own to reverse the course of a more uneven fight.
- NFZs should not be expected to be powerful coercive instruments, as they are a generally milder form of sanction than most other uses of military power and the costs they impose tend to accumulate gradually.
- NFZs can involve prolonged and open-ended commitments of forces.
- If the results of an NFZ appear unsatisfactory, it may be difficult not to escalate in pursuit of a better outcome.
- Develop a more complete picture of the impact of no-fly zones (NFZs) in places like Bosnia and Iraq.
- Further explore alternative approaches and concepts of operations for conducting NFZs alone and in conjunction with other operations.
- Approach NFZs as a subset of a broader strategic category of "aerial occupation," and consider the connections between NFZs and measures such as no-drive zones, naval blockades, and punitive air strikes.