Operating Low-Cost, Reusable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Contested Environments
Preliminary Evaluation of Operational Concepts
ResearchPublished May 11, 2020
The 2018 National Defense Strategy called on the U.S. Department of Defense to turn its attention to confronting capabilities that challenge U.S. forces in future conflicts. This report summarizes early thinking and analysis about how the Air Force might employ a force of "attritable"—low-cost and reusable—unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and what effects such a force might achieve in the most demanding conventional warfighting scenarios.
Preliminary Evaluation of Operational Concepts
ResearchPublished May 11, 2020
There are disquieting trends in the military balance of power. Both Russia and China are fielding military capabilities and postures that, in wartime, would make it extremely challenging for U.S. forces to project power and defeat large-scale aggression. The 2018 National Defense Strategy called on the U.S. Department of Defense to turn priority attention to developing innovative capabilities and concepts for confronting these challenges.
The U.S. Air Force has increased its efforts to explore the demands of warfare in highly contested environments, and is devising and evaluating new approaches to defeating aggression in those environments. One intriguing approach is to employ large numbers of relatively low-cost, attritable—reusable, and ultimately expendable—unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to perform a variety of tasks in support of joint force defensive campaigns. This could allow land-based forces to generate and sustain airpower without relying on fixed base infrastructure, such as runways and maintenance facilities. The implications of such an approach for the resiliency of forward-based forces and for their effectiveness in the opening days of a conflict could be profound.
The authors of this report summarize early thinking and analysis about how the U.S. Air Force might employ such a force, and what effects it might achieve in the most-demanding conventional warfighting scenarios.
This research was commissioned by the United States Air Force and conducted by RAND Project AIR FORCE.
This publication is part of the RAND research report series. Research reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND research reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.