Nonresident Father Involvement: Do Mothers and Fathers See Eye-to-Eye? An Investigation of the Impact of Reporting Discrepancies on Parameter Estimates

by Lee Mizell

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This dissertation explores issues associated with the use of mothers' proxy reports of nonresident fathers' characteristics and behaviors in analysis of child well-being. Specifically, it addresses the following research questions: (1) Are there discrepancies between mothers' and nonresident fathers' reports of nonresident fathers' characteristics and behaviors? (2) Do these discrepancies occur systematically in a manner that potentially underrepresents nonresident fathers' involvement with and on behalf of their children? (3) Do reporting discrepancies cause parameters estimates to vary depending on whose reports are used? (4) Does information about these discrepancies help us understand variation in child well-being? and (5) What are the implications for future research and policymaking? In answering these questions this dissertation makes three contributions to the body of existing research on nonresident fathers and families and to policymaking and practice. It first reveals how using paired data for traditionally difficult-to-survey families may be biased in the absence of a nonresponse correction. It then identifies if and/or which parameter estimates in existing research that use mothers as proxy reporters for nonresident fathers might be biased. Finally, because social policies and programs frequently target difficult-to-reach populations, it illuminates the question of whether or not it is worthwhile to allocate additional resources to collect data from them. Findings suggest that there are real differences in the way mothers and fathers report nonresident father characteristics and behavior, and that these discrepancies affect estimates of the relationship between nonresident father involvement and child well-being. Discrepancies may be due to instrumentation, latent variables, a true lack of knowledge on the part of the mother, and differences in mothers' and fathers' experiences with and perceptions of parenting, as well as social pressures and child effects.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Background and Policy Context

  • Chapter Two

    Who Are Nonresident Fathers?

  • Chapter Three

    What Do We Know About Father Involvement? Why Might What We Know Be Biased?

  • Chapter Four

    Adjusting for Nonresponse Bias in the Data

  • Chapter Five

    The Sample

  • Chapter Six

    Discrepancies in Mother and Nonresident Father Reports

  • Chapter Seven

    Do Discrepancies in Reports Affect Parameter Estimates?

  • Chapter Eight

    Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Appendix A

    Mothers' and Nonresidents Fathers' Responses on Matching Questions – Not Constrained to Skip Patterns

  • Appendix B

    Description of the Dependent and Independent Variables Used in Regression Analysis

  • Appendix C

    Regression Results With Father-Reported Data

  • Appendix D

    PSID CDS Survey Instruments

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.