The Ecological Context of Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes? Implications for NIMBY Disputes and Client Placement Decisions

by Jerry O. Jacobson

Full Document

Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Summary Only

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Most admissions to drug treatment end in client dropout. Although scholars have examined a number of factors related to client characteristics and program components, location-the physical, social, and economic attributes of neighborhoods where treatment clients live and receive treatment-has largely been ignored. The author develops hypotheses of the influence of "treatment ecology" on retention, characterize the residential and treatment environments of the population of treatment clients in Los Angeles County in the period 1998-2000, tests for an association between neighborhood-level factors and client retention, and derives bounds on the expected impact of location-oriented policies on individual and countywide retention. Clients' residential environments are significantly worse than those of the non-client household population, particularly with respect to social stressors and drug availability, that the neighborhoods of treatment centers are worse still, and that homeless, African American, and other minority clients face the worst environments overall. Failure to complete in both outpatient and residential settings is associated with neighborhood-level social stressors. A policy that matched all clients with the most appropriate neighborhood could increase the countywide rate of retention by up to 30 percent.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introducing the Notion of a Treatment Ecology

  • Chapter Two

    The Physical Environments Where Addicts in Recovery Live and Receive Treatment, Los Angeles 1998-2000

  • Chapter Three

    Do Neighborhood Conditions Influence Attrition?

  • Chapter Four

    The Policy Implications of These Findings

  • Chapter Five

    Application of These Findings to NIMBY Disputes

  • Chapter Six

    A Summary of Major Findings and Contributions

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.