Cover: Achievement Effects of Five Comprehensive School Reform Designs Implemented in Los Angeles Unified School District

Achievement Effects of Five Comprehensive School Reform Designs Implemented in Los Angeles Unified School District

Published Oct 24, 2005

by Bryce Mason

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

The author estimated achievement effects as measured by the Stanford Achievement Test 9 for students in grades 1–11 who participated in America’s Choice, Co-nect, Different Ways of Knowing, Success for All (SFA), and Urban Learning Centers comprehensive school reform (CSR) designs implemented in the Los Angeles Unified School District between 1999 and 2002. This study yielded effects estimates that were generally less than prior research has suggested. The author found no consistent evidence across the five CSR designs that earlier intervention caused larger gains. However, students who began SFA in grades 1 or 2 benefited in reading, mathematics, and language arts. Results suggested that comparison group selection methods accounted for smaller effect sizes rather than being an artifact of where the reforms were implemented. Conditional on a statistically significant average achievement effect, there was strong evidence that longer participation caused larger effects. Policymakers thinking of implementing a CSR design must consider that prior-effects research might have overestimated achievement effects due to less internally valid research methods.

Research conducted by

This document was submitted as a dissertation in August 2005 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of Charles Goldman (Chair), Brian Stecher, and Brian Finch.

This publication is part of the RAND dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.