Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 1.8 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Summary Only
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
This research assesses the effectiveness of the Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles (PNGV) in improving relationships among its members. The period examined is the decade of the 1990s, a period when U.S. industrial competitiveness was a significant national concern, and laws enabled new forms of industrial cooperation such as R&D partnerships. While PNGV’s ultimate technical accomplishments were limited, this study finds that this government-industry partnership did improve the relationship between the government and this industry. This study also provides practical observations on specific aspects of a partnership to emulate or avoid.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
A Brief History of U.S. Automotive Policy
Chapter Three
PNGV Design and Implementation
Chapter Four
Theory Related to Automotive Policy and PNGV
Chapter Five
Prior PNGV Research and This Dissertation
Chapter Six
Study Design
Chapter Seven
Data and Methods
Chapter Eight
Relationships Between Government and Industry
Chapter Nine
Relationships Within the Domestic Auto Industry
Chapter Ten
Components of Relationships Among Participants
Chapter Eleven
PNGV in the Rear-View Mirror
Chapter Twelve
A Vehicle for Change?
Appendix A
Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms
Appendix B
Documents Related to Research Interviews
Appendix C
Codes Assigned to Automotive News "Opinion" Columns
Research conducted by
This document was submitted as a dissertation in December 2009 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree in public policy analysis at the Pardee RAND Graduate School. The faculty committee that supervised and approved the dissertation consisted of James Bonomo (Chair), Steven W. Popper, and Paul C. Light.
This publication is part of the RAND Corporation Dissertation series. Pardee RAND dissertations are produced by graduate fellows of the Pardee RAND Graduate School, the world's leading producer of Ph.D.'s in policy analysis. The dissertations are supervised, reviewed, and approved by a Pardee RAND faculty committee overseeing each dissertation.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.