Community Engagement as Input to the Design of the Environmental Center at Frick Park and Beyond

Tamara Dubowitz, Kristy Gonzalez Morganti, Rachel M. Burns, Marla C. Haims

ResearchPublished Nov 8, 2011

In 2011, the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy focused its park restoration efforts on the design and development of the new Environmental Center at Frick Park (ECFP) building, paying special attention to underserved communities and children within the vicinity of the park who have not historically participated in environmental education programming at the center. To obtain community group and resident input into the ECFP design, and to acquire information about residents' attitudes toward and use of Frick Park more generally, RAND Corporation researchers conducted community focus groups and brief informal interviews with a total of 81 local residents.

The researchers found that many residents are interested in environmental issues and education and that some currently use Frick Park. However, there is a general lack of awareness of ECFP programs and activities, and there are also many barriers to using the park. The authors offer recommendations for the design of the new building, for the structuring and content of ECFP programs, for improving access to the park and the center, and for successfully marketing park programs.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 2011
  • Pages: 57
  • Document Number: TR-1168-PPC

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Dubowitz, Tamara, Kristy Gonzalez Morganti, Rachel M. Burns, and Marla C. Haims, Community Engagement as Input to the Design of the Environmental Center at Frick Park and Beyond. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2011. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1168.html.
BibTeX RIS

This work was sponsored by the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy. The research was conducted in RAND Health, a unit of the RAND Corporation.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.