American Public Support for U.S. Military Operations from Mogadishu to Baghdad

Technical Appendixes

Eric V. Larson, Bogdan Savych

ResearchPublished Dec 13, 2004

Cover: American Public Support for U.S. Military Operations from Mogadishu to Baghdad
Download PDF
Additional Downloads

Includes other ebook formats

This document supplies the technical appendixes for a study that describes American public opinion toward the use of military force in support of the global war on terrorism (GWOT), delineates the sources of support and opposition, and identifies potential fault lines in support. The final report is Eric V. Larson and Bogdan Savych, American Public Support for U.S. Military Operations from Mogadishu to Baghdad, Santa Monica, CA: RAND, MG-231-A, 2004. These appendixes describe bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses of respondent-level public opinion data from polling during the final stages of the U.S. military intervention Somalia, the peace operations in Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo, the war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda Organization in Afghanistan, and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s Baathist regime in Iraq.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 2004
  • Pages: 68
  • Document Number: TR-167-A

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Larson, Eric V. and Bogdan Savych, American Public Support for U.S. Military Operations from Mogadishu to Baghdad: Technical Appendixes. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2004. https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR167.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

The research described in this report was sponsored by the United StatesArmy and conducted by the RAND Arroyo Center.

This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.