Preliminary Analyses for Refinement of the Tier Comorbidities in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System
Download eBook for Free
(includes all revisions)
|PDF file||0.2 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
In 2002, Medicare phased in the implementation of a prospective payment system (PPS) for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) that included a way of addressing the added costs of treating patients with certain comorbidities. The payments for those comorbidities were determined by means of a system that ranked costly comorbidities in three cost tiers. Using data from the first year when almost all hospitals were fully paid under the PPS (FY 2003), the authors examined the relationship between comorbidities and marginal cost and the frequency with which individual comorbidities were assigned to IRF patients. They found problems with some of the tier comorbidities: Some conditions were no longer related to treatment costs; other conditions should be put in a different tier; some costly diagnoses were not part of the tier system. The authors conclude that the tier system remains an important means for matching payments to costs, although it will require a reasonable amount of revision in response to coding changes found during FY 2003. On balance, however, they judged the performance of the system to be acceptably stable, especially in the face of the large change in coding (or case mix).
Table of Contents
Data and Methods
Current Tier Conditions and Diagnoses
Exploration of Possible Additions to Tier Conditions
Implications of Suggested Changes in Diagnoses Lists
The research described in this report was supported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and conducted by RAND Health.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Technical report series. RAND technical reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.