Preliminary Analyses of Changes in Coding and Case Mix Under the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System
ResearchPublished May 20, 2005
ResearchPublished May 20, 2005
The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 mandated use of a prospective payment system (PPS) to pay for Medicare patient stays at inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and stated that changes in the payment amounts should accurately reflect changes in IRFs’ patient case mix — that is, the true cost of treating patients — and not be influenced by changes in coding practices. This RAND report uses characteristics of related acute care records to compare IRF case mix during 2002, the first year of the IRF PPS, with case mix during 1999, under the old system. Payments per discharge were 3.4 percent higher in 2002 than in 1999. There is some evidence that the patients admitted to IRFs in 2002 had lower resource needs than the patients admitted in 1999, although there also is substantial uncertainty about the amount of lower resources needed. The authors’ show that coding changes increased payment between 1.9 percent and 5.9 percent between 1999 and 2002 and that real change caused between a 1.4-percent decline and a 2.4-percent increase in needed resources. They recommend that CMS lower future payments under the IRF PPS by at least 1.9 percent to eliminate or reduce the effect of coding on future payments.
The research described in this report was supported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and conducted by RAND Health.
This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.