Changes in Patient Severity Following Implementation of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System
ResearchPublished Feb 6, 2006
ResearchPublished Feb 6, 2006
The Medicare program in 2002 instituted an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) prospective payment system (PPS). IRFs are specialized hospitals or hospital units that provide intensive rehabilitation in an inpatient setting. Under the IRF PPS, Medicare pays facilities a predetermined rate per discharged patient, which depends on the patient’s age, impairment, functional status, and comorbidities. Some facilities receive special rates for short-stay transfer patients, high-cost outliers, and patients who die in hospital. Prospective payment gives facilities incentives to provide care efficiently, since they can keep any difference between the set payment and their costs. However, this also gives facilities incentives to change their care and practice patterns in other ways and to change their coding practices to increase revenue. This report examines the effects of the IRF PPS on patient access to care, to determine if access for more severely ill patients is being restricted. The authors test three hypotheses: (1) Fewer patients with conditions costly to treat will be treated, (2) relatively costly cases within case-mix and comorbidity groups will experience reduced access to IRF care, (3) patients with conditions costly to treat will receive less-intense care. They found no evidence to support the first hypothesis and little evidence to support the second. However, the third hypothesis might be supported; the authors observed a decrease in patients’ average length of stay after implementation of IRF PPS, which might indicate that facilities are reducing the intensity of care. But they also note that this could be part of a trend that began before 2002.
The research descibed in this report was supported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was performed under the auspices of RAND Health.
This publication is part of the RAND technical report series. RAND technical reports, products of RAND from 2003 to 2011, presented research findings on a topic limited in scope or intended for a narrow audience; discussions of the methodology employed in research; literature reviews, survey instruments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; and preliminary findings. All RAND technical reports were subject to rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.